×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Professional paper

ECOLOGICALLY ACCEPTABLE LUBRICANTS

By
M. Dugić ,
M. Dugić

Oil Refinery, Modriča, Bosnia and Herzegovina

P. Dugić ,
P. Dugić

Oil Refinery , Modriča, Bosnia and Herzegovina

R. Macura
R. Macura

Faculty of Sciences, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

Increase of ecological awareness affected the realization of more strict laws concerning the environment, which are being imposed in many countries. It also affected lubricant area and tendency for decreased pollution that lubricants can induce if they are uncontrollably spread around. Earlier it was believed that biodegradability is the most important criteria for evaluating the ecologically acceptable lubricants. Many studies had given the results of testing the affect that lubricants have on flora and fauna in water, their accumulation potential and human health. European Union commission had presented in 2005. the document under number 2005/360/EC that applies on lubricants that can carry the so-called Eco-label. It defines seven basic criteria that lubricants must fulfill. Manufacturers of components for lubricant production and lubricants itself had gotten newmissions. In this paper are shown the results of lubricant testing that completely satisfy the given criteria. They apply on toxicity for flora and fauna in water, bio accumulation potential and harmful health impact potential. Special demand is applied on using feedstock that are not only biodegradable, but are produced from renewable sources, and thus fulfill technical lubricant performances.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is made freely available online under an open-access model under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC-http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/BY-NC-ND 4.0).

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.