Faculty of Technology Novi Sad, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia
Faculty of Technology Novi Sad, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia
Faculty of Technology Novi Sad, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia
Faculty of Technology Novi Sad, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia
Faculty of Technology Novi Sad, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia
Technical school “Pavle Savić” , Novi Sad , Serbia
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade , Belgrade , Serbia
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade , Belgrade , Serbia
Faculty for Food Technology, Food Safety and Ecology, University of Donja Gorica , Podgorica , Montenegro
Meat is one of the most nutritious foods that humans can consume, and is defined as the flesh (skeletal muscles) of animals used as food. In addition to protein and fat, meat is a significant source of several micronutrients (minerals and vitamins). Edible offal is also a form of meat which is used as food, but which is not skeletal muscles, and in general possesses higher contents of some micronutrients, especially minerals and vitamins, than muscular tissue. Minerals are the inorganic elements other than carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen, which remain behind in the ash when food is incinerated. They are usually divided into two groups – macrominerals (main elements) and microminerals (trace elements) or into three groups – main elements (macrominerals), trace elements (microminerals) and ultra-trace elements. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the existing literature on the content of nine most abundant minerals (potassium, phosphorous, sodium, magnesium, calcium, zinc, iron, copper and manganese) in the major raw pork meat cuts (tenderloin, ham, loin and shoulder) and edible offal (tongue, heart, lungs, liver, spleen, kidney, brain and spinal cord) from indigenous pigs. The mineral levels in raw pork meat and pig edible offal are variable, ranging from 175.7 to 463.8 mg/100g for potassium; 159 to 502.0 mg/100g for phosphorous; 38.11 to 158.4 mg/100g for sodium; 8.3 to 28.5 mg/100g for magnesium; 4.61 to 26.02 mg/100g for calcium; 0.67 to 6.47 mg/100g for zinc; 0.55 to 45.59 mg/100g for iron; 0.10 to 0.825 mg/100g for copper; and from 0.0038 to 0.338 mg/100g for manganese.
Authors retain copyright. This work is made freely available online under an open-access model under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC-http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/BY-NC-ND 4.0).
6
Elena Saguer, Blanca Abril, Mirian Pateiro, Roberto Bermúdez, Rubén Domínguez-Valencia, Ricard Bou
(2024)
Strategies for Porcine Liver Valorization as a Source of Food Ingredients
Current Food Science and Technology Reports, 2(3)
10.1007/s43555-024-00038-4
Narcís Feliu-Alsina, Elena Saguer
(2023)
Microbiological Quality and Physicochemical Characteristics of Pork Livers Supplied by an Industrial Slaughterhouse
Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, ()
10.31883/pjfns/162874
Kinga Kropiwiec-Domańska, Marek Babicz, Magdalena Szyndler-Nędza, Mirosław Tyra, Ewa Skrzypczak
(2024)
Analysis of Physical Parameters and Chemical Composition of Offal From Puławska Fattening Pigs Raised in Deep Litter and Slatted Floor Housing Systems
Annals of Animal Science, 24(1)
10.2478/aoas-2023-0070
Laura Tarjuelo, Adrián Rabadán, Manuel Álvarez-Ortí, Arturo Pardo-Giménez, José E. Pardo
(2023)
Analysis of Nutritional Characteristics and Willingness to Pay of Consumers for Dry-Cured Sausages (Salchichón) Made with Textured Seed Oils
Foods, 12(16)
10.3390/foods12163118
Maria Olga Varrà, Lenka Husáková, Emanuela Zanardi, Giovanni Loris Alborali, Jan Patočka, Adriana Ianieri, Sergio Ghidini
(2023)
Elemental profiles of swine tissues as descriptors for the traceability of value-added Italian heavy pig production chains
Meat Science, 204()
10.1016/j.meatsci.2023.109285
Marielle M. O. Paula, Lorrany R. Carmo, Paulo R. Fontes, Simone F. V. Cunha, Alcinéia L. S. Ramos, Eduardo M. Ramos
(2025)
Characterization of porcine liver protein isolates for use as techno-functional or biofortification ingredients in foods
Journal of Food Science and Technology, ()
10.1007/s13197-025-06375-zThe statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.